Tax
A holding company solves three specific problems well. If you do not have one of them, you have bought several thousand dollars a year of compliance.
Holding companies get recommended reflexively. Sometimes correctly. But a holdco is a structure, not a benefit, and it carries a real annual cost: a second corporate return, a second set of books, intercompany balances to track, and a second filing deadline to miss.
If you are a single shareholder, distributing most of what you earn, with no excess cash and no sale on the horizon, a holdco adds cost and complexity with no offsetting benefit. It does not reduce your tax rate. It does not create a deduction. It moves money between two pockets you already own.
The cost, honestly
Budget for a second year-end, bookkeeping, and the advisory time to keep intercompany accounts clean. If the structure is not solving a named problem, that is money spent on tidiness.
The argument for setting one up early is that inserting a holdco later, especially close to a transaction, invites scrutiny and can compromise the exemption if the timing tests are not met. The argument against is paying for years of compliance for a transaction that may not come. The honest middle: if an exit is plausible within three years, or excess cash is accumulating now, build it. Otherwise wait, and revisit annually.
General information for Canadian founders, current to 2026. It is not tax advice and does not account for your specific facts. Rates, thresholds and rules change, confirm the current figures before acting.
A short call is usually enough to tell you whether there is anything here worth acting on.